A Few Questions for Those Thinking They Understand 9-11

Many times I see claims of thermite, explosives and a variety of combinations of super-nano-exo-thermate HD 2.0a. Whenever these claims are made, they are based loosely on a combination of what they heard, read, or saw on the Internet. The funniest part is that they truly believe their claims even though they have taken no time to corroborate any of them with an independent source.

So, to counter their ignorance of the subject, I have created a list of questions I would like any of these CTists to answer. I realize that most of these questions are really simple and some are a little more difficult since they require a higher knowledge of employing explosives in a demolition situation. To help with the answering of these questions, I have asked that they get the assistance of an explosives expert or anybody within the demolition industry. I know they cant because there isn't a single member of either that believes that there were explosives in any of the WTCs.

We will see what kind of answers we get. My first response was a typical non-answer of "You're a sick puppy", then they ran off. I guess it is OK for them to ask questions, but they get too offended when they are on the receiving end of a few.

1. How did you conclude that thermite can burn longer than 10 minutes?
2. How much thermite would be needed to collapse 3 skyscrapers?
3. How much explosives would be needed to collapse 3 skyscrapers?
4. How much time would be needed to setup, wire, cover up that much explosives and incendiary devices?
5. How does thermite burn laterally?
6. Where are the traces of the signature of thermite when there would be literally 1000s of tons needed to accomplish the theory of Prof Jones?
7. Why has Prof Jones refused to allow independent analysis of his work?
8. Why has Prof Jones not released any information about the explosive residue he would be in possession of?
9. Why does Professor Jones use so many qualifiers when makes his claims?
10. Why has there NEVER been a single trace of explosive residue found?
11. Why no visible signs of standard controlled demolition work on any of the 3 buildings?
12. Why no audio signs of standard controlled demolition work on any of the 3 buildings?
13. Why no signs of the standard cuts needed to employ explosive cutter charges?
14. Why not a single detonator was ever found at Ground Zero?
15. Why not a single demolition component was ever found at Ground Zero?
16. Why the seismic evidence that you have didn’t register any anomaly that would prove a controlled demolition?
17. Why do you think incendiaries would be used since they are inherently dangerous due to their slow burning and unpredictable and have never been used in a controlled demolition?
18. What is the primary use of thermite?
19. Why has every explosive expert think that you are wrong in thinking explosives and/or incendiaries were used on 9-11?
20. Why have all of the leaders of the 9-11 truth movement not consult a single explosive or demolitions expert to base any of their conclusions?
21. Why do you think a Professor of Folklore and Theology seem to be the basis of all the talking points? Isn’t he paid to justify belief in various forms of faith without evidence?
22. Why do you believe <1%>

If you wish to go toe-to-toe with me regarding your theories about explosives and/or incendiaries, be sure to have some help from experts. This will help you from looking terribly helpless on this topic.

Prof Jones' Thermite/Thermate Theory Takes Another Big Hit

In researching the presence of the elements of thermite/thermate in the dust sampling of ground zero, Prof Jones changed his story from saying the proof of the use of incendiary devices were from the presence of iron, aluminum, and sulfur. When told that these are common building materials, he then went back and did more research.

The next version of his story came when he said the presence of iron-rich microspheres were found in the dust samples and this proved that the use of thermite/thermate. He then went on state that the only way iron-rich microspheres can be formed is by a very high heat environment such as thermite can produce.

When asked for his sources for these claims, they went unanswered.

So, I checked out several sources for microspheres and found out that fly ash from incinerators contain the very same iron-rich microspheres that Prof Jones seemed to think was only produced from thermite. I checked further. Looking for the resulting use of fly ash, I found out that it is used in many construction materials such as concrete, plaster, drywall, and other powder based substances.

We cannot remove the possibility of the spheres being formed by steel workers cutting the beams for removal and even the steel workers cutting and welding the beams for installation. This shows that there would be a very strange environment at ground zero if there were no spheres.

It seems that Professor Jones has once again been exposed as relying on a single talking point and when it falls out from under him, he becomes accusatory and didn't like to hear that information.

I wonder what his next steps are: 1. He has chosen not to release his work on the thermite signature or any of his scientific findings; 2. The smoking gun he would have in his possession known as explosive residue from the dust samples; and 3. Why he chooses to limit his peer-reviews to only pieces that agree with 100% of his opinion and not any scientific work that proves his completely wrong by many other scientists.

It seems he is not being very scientific or intellectually honest. I guess he has chosen to allow his followers to think a certain way and not give them any chance of validating his work or allowing them to ask questions. The followers are doing their job quite well and are parroting his work and being obediently quiet in referring to the details of his work.

http://suwic.group.shef.ac.uk/posters/p-ash.pdf

As with any of my points, please send them to other experts for clarification or refutation.